I would love to see the head of these pseudo-Patriots who pushed Biya’s regime into violence by making him believe that the English-speaking problem is an internal problem and that there will be no foreign interference.
Now that the government is trying desperately, without much success, to justify its positions, where are these great advisors? Why mysterious and convoluted theories about international relations and the principle of non-interference are no longer working?
Where did the diplomats arrive in Cameroon, one following the others, in an endless rosary, asking all the government to do everything to restore peace in the NWSW?
For a problem that we were told inside, all the powers of the world now have an eye on us and sometimes threats come and harden. Everyone is looking at us with hardness and doubts.
When it is known that the great dialogue, with its special status, has claimed to have solved the crisis, what are they coming to do? Are they in turn convinced it was pipo?
Currently, these pseudo-Patriots who pushed the government to difficulty with their bluster are reduced to count on the support of China or Russia! Do they know what they’re talking about?
Or so, on the patriotism of Cameroonians! But God, what patriotism can we count when two parts of Cameroon are fighting? Patriotism is on which side and patriots will fight who? How are they going to do it?
Foreign Powers do not harass the government of Cameroon at random! They didn’t take a map and randomly point a finger at Cameroon! They are mixing with our business because there is an internal problem serious enough to ask for their attention! It’s good because the English speakers took the weapons to end the unity state that foreigners are there!
People talk about what patriotism?
We don’t know what speech to make to explain to the government that it is in error! Totally in error, and that its position is not sustainable!
From the first day, we explained that the English-speaking problem was infinitely deeper because it reported the failure of the United Nation and that it had to come out of it, without the slightest state of soul, because we recognize the true leaders to their ability to Slice on the live, even if it bleeds.
Instead, we were opposed to the philosophy and the so-called “acquired” of the United Nation and other bullshit of the same kind! How can we make us believe that going from a federal state to a united state is a step forward? Where is it written? Supported by what thesis? What theory is this? And this is supported by what example in the world?
Apart from the Cameroon regime and its hagiographa, which author in the world since humanity exists has claimed that a United State realized more development, peace and unity than a federal state?
No author! We are clearly in the presence of people who love power until madness! We explained to biya’s regime that it is in its greatest interest to divide the budget in 2, to give half to regional states by getting rid of all the needs of proximity, and to manage the other half For its strategic missions. This would have protected him himself, but these people love power beyond simple common sense, until suicide!
In any case, the regime has made the crazy bet to reduce English-speaking independence with its old techniques of the brutal and Central United State and to neglect the international dimension of this problem. A serious inexplicable fault with people who are supposed to advise him and this, for two reasons:
- the current environment: we are no longer in 1960, but in 2019 where these concepts of “internal problem in a state” have lost all the importance of past. The Nict and above all, the internet has transformed the world into a global village, and no one can last the non-interference to hope to commit crimes at home. These stories that you can afford to do anything at home, not from non-interference, are the business of the past century. Today, you arrest an opponent, you disapprove of the press, you will sign a demonstration, your actions are seen at the moment by the whole world that disapprove of you and can take action against you. You can even, in the event of a crime, answer it before the international criminal court or even foreign courts like Hussein Babré. There is no refuge for the criminal authorities who would have expected to reduce the English-speaking crisis by killing its people. So there was no chance that repression of secessionist movement left foreign powers indifferent.
- The English-speaking algues: even if the principle of non-interference still had its full effect, it would not apply to English speakers, given that southern Cameroon was deputy to the republic under the model of a federal state and under the auspices of the United Nations. It is not clear how people who had organized this marriage could let the unity state continue its plans of absorption of this community.
In any case, the calculations of the head of state’s advisors were bad. The English-speaking problem will be increasingly internationalized, and there will be a time when the government will lose control of the situation.
As I had to say, unity Cameroon is no longer sustainable with English speakers. And you have to remove from the head that civil can be extinguished without the return to the federation of 1961 or at least, an equivalent Federation!
It’s impossible!
There is no point to insist!
Dieudonné Essomba